Ruby !

July 30, 2010 at 8:14 am (Cloud Computing, Computer Science, Free Software, Opensource, Programming, Python, Ruby, Ruby on Rails, Technology, Web2.0) (, , , , , )

Update: I wanted to mention that I have thoroughly overstated the situation as far as Rails apps seemingly being used more by “real sites”. I noticed a Django developer doing some awesome work on some Discovery websites and a few others. I guess it’s just me hoping that it was Python and not me. Well I guess it is me. I ‘ll keep leaning on my noob status until I can hopefully no longer use that crutch. Thanks to Derek the Python/Django guy who made me take a second look.

It amazes me that the most english-like programming language in the world was built by someone who is not a native english speaker. Maybe the simplicity comes from his inability at the time to be overly verbose, using only statements and such that best communicated an idea to someone with a very basic english vocabulary. I think since Matz has become pretty fluent in the english language though.

One other thing I would like to note. I remember a talk that DHH the creator of Rails gave along with Adrian Holavity, one of the Django creators. DHH ekpt saying that he felt some of the architectural decisions behind Django were better suited to we sites where in his mind Rails ‘ architecure was better suited to web apps. At the time I took as a somewhat snide remark, thinking listen to this saying that Django was for building simple web pages and Rails was for building “real” web apps. Well if you take a look on the web now I think the statement rings true, there seems to be many more complicated, detailed Rails apps compared to Django’s hundreds of sites that seem rather simplistic in the app side of the functionality. Just an observation. What do you think?


Permalink 5 Comments

Web business, Jason Calacanis or Matt Mullenweg!

July 8, 2010 at 1:54 am (Apple, Cloud Computing, Evil, Free Software, nonEvil, Open Web, Opensource, Programming, Rant, Technology, Web2.0)

I  have been watching This Week in Startups quite a bit lately. As much as I like the shows, the guests, and even Jason Calacanis, he can really come off as a pompous jerk. The show I was watching this evening prompted this post when he started the show talking about having a bad day and as he started to reveal his day he started playing with his hair and mentioning that he “drove in with the tops down in the Tesla“. You know the type, the name dropping type of guy that would seem to be insecure, but I think there is more to him then that. I guess I am kind of annoyed with the side of web startups that are all that made the dotcom boom go bust. You know the guys that are constantly trying to figure out how they can squeeze money from the internet backbone as a junky tries to squeeze his fix from the dealer. Now don’t get me wrong there is an aggressive business side to every successful startup, but the web startups that seem to be the biggest booms are the ones that are created by someone that is passionate about solving a problem and in some cases they even start as they are trying to fix their individual problem(DHH Ruby on Rails). If for nothing else but to save some time (Rasmus Lerdof creator of PHP). Well those are they ideas that blowup because of the sincerity and the lack of the marketing, research pompous money grabbers. Then looking at the new startups Jason is working on seems to show that he cares so little about some of the things relating to his startups that his ideas lack focus and clarity. I loved when I found This Week in Startups and truly feel that is Jason’s niche only to find that now it is world domination, not just with startups (what I consider him rightly qualified for) but this week in books, games, iPads, coffee cups etc. Even Facebook came from a place of sincerity and a genuine need, not to mention obviously from the person that wanted to and was able to fill that niche.
As I search for my place in the larger picture of technology and where I feel best suited to venture out on my own. I also realize that just because I come up with an idea it does not mean that I am the right person to solve it. Like Jason’s Mahalo site I believe is way to vague to attract the future that most people would hope for in a solid startup. I know they are getting the traffic and such but I believe when these targets are narrowed down more to a fixed subject with a reason to exist they succeed because the need was waiting to be filled. Stackoverflow besides the fact of having Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood already hitting the ground running was able and passionate about solving the problem at hand. There are in my opinion a few ingredients needed for a successful web startup and the idea and implementation are two of those, but you can tell when the passion, sincerity and believability are missing. The startup has to be more than a company wanting to be sold, it must be a company able to sell and not only through the burst of hype that they get in the first year or two but in the years to come which comes from the genuine desire to solve a problem and follow through with it.
I know there are many who will disagree with me but if there are two camps of entrepeneurs on the web, the dotcommers and the hacker types, who would be there regardless of the millions in the bank.
I guess I would consider myself to be on the side of the Matt Mullenwegs (WordPress) of the web, more than the Jason Calacanises. If you want to see the difference watch some of the interviews Jason gives with the likes of a Matt Mullenweg or a David Heinemeier Hansson (Ruby on Rails, 37Signals) and you’ll see the difference when Jason asks these two about why they wouldn’t want to sell their companies and cash out now.
Just my two cents as always. But I still love ya Jason and will continue to watch the webcasts.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Webapps and the cloud!

June 15, 2010 at 3:23 pm (Cloud Computing, Evil, Google, nonEvil, Open Web, Rant, Technology)

After reading the article concerning Mozilla’s support for the client side storage in Firefox 4, it made me consider probably my biggest problem with the cloud and web apps as a complete desktop replacement. That being the storage of all documents and such as an answer to say the now Microsoft Office/Windows scenario. I guess not only the actual storage now that I think about it further. The fact that the apps are server side the maker of the app in Google’s case is “listening” to everything you are doing. How would anyone have reacted to Microsoft downloading your text as it is typed in your Word or Excel documents as a way of backing up your work. As much as it can be framed as a utilitarian use their is the flip side of the coin. The Google’s of the world using the interaction for what I would consider unknown purposes. Most average people, not power users or geeks are not aware of the level of snooping that goes on when they are surfing the net. Most users computers that I fix are littered with their interactions that I know most are oblivious to because when I ask them are they visiting such and such sites and contracting viruses they believe that deleted their history from the address bar in their browser gives them privacy. Imagine the level of surprise when most of the general public becomes aware of how unprivate their private life has become.

My blog has become my unrestricted Twitter ha ha!

Permalink Leave a Comment

Web Browser as the OS?

June 12, 2010 at 11:39 am (Cloud Computing, Evil, Free Software, Google, Linux, Open Web, Opensource, Personal, Programming, Rant, Technology)

This idea always struck me as kind of odd because no matter how you slice it the browser is not smart enough nor is meant to control the hardware etc. I like to think about it as though the actual windows are more intelligent, or connected. Sort of the same abstraction that is given by the X/Windows environment on Unix/Linux type systems. The browser application becomes the window manager in a way.

When the browser begins to handle such tasks as hardware and process management, it no longer is considered only a browser. It is an operating system running a single application, a web browser. The idea of the web operating system in it’s most real sense would be a WAN connected server taking over some tasks that our operating systems are handling locally now. Forgive me for feeling like this is taking a step back. I believe the ideal future will be very capable hardware on the client working in a more networked-by-design, distributed sense. There are certain tasks that I believe should not involve network latency etc. We already are dealing with applications being slow and ultimately using a great deal of resources. The only difference will be taking the latency from the local bus of the PC and transferring it to the network. That doesn’t fix anything, or move us ahead technologically. What happens is that someone gets to monetize everything about our communications, even more then is happening now. I believe there are applications that are better left handling things locally. Not to mention with most “free” web applications there is someone monetizing your personal data without you being aware. Even if you do not store your data on their servers, your keystrokes and network communications etc are mined, without your permission in most cases. I know the the 5 page license mentioned that they will be mining your data and communications “to better serve the customers needs”, but most users would not agree to half of the license agreements that they unknowingly agree to by clicking through windows to get to their work. You know how it is, check here, click here to start using etc.

Please people think about the ramifications. There is a reason we moved from mainframe type computing to local processing and storage. I like the idea of all homes running their own servers with their data and such. Now the business model changes but there are still ways of taking the complexity away from the common users. With so much added complexity with servers and the like being at user’s homes, there would be a need for subscription support services and the like. Which could be handled remotely, not adding distraction or inconvenience to the customer’s experience.

Linux would be a perfect fit for such a scenario.

While I am on the subject of web operating systems. The fact that Google takes advantage of the fact that users must pay for Windows or other proprietary operating systems makers but can use ChromeOS for free is a bit disingenuous. You are paying for it just not when you buy your PC or when you buy the CD from Best Buy. If things go the way Google likes you no longer need Windows Mac or anything else. Just a dumb terminal connected to Google’s non-evil monopoly. They want to give you your phone, your OS, your office applications, your email application, your navigation/GPS device application. Is there anything I’m leaving out. Think about the power that comes from that level of integration. Everything about you, where you are at any given time, all your personal information, your communications, likes, dislikes, secrets etc, stored on Google’s servers. Welcome to cloud computing.

Permalink Leave a Comment

The cloud scares the hell out of me!!

June 10, 2010 at 4:30 pm (Cloud Computing, Evil, Open Web, Personal, Rant, Technology) (, , )

This may be old news to some but we need to as a society wonder if we really want to put all this power in the hands of greedy corps looking to sell their mother if they could.

The conversation involving Zuckerburg of Facebook while coding and releasing Facebook while at Harvard is telling of how humans deal with great power. Even if he was joking, the very thought that he may have used any of the information he attained against or for his own greedy appetite should answer the question for us all whether the future of the web will be all the world’s citizens info stored on a few filthy rich corporate greed mongers servers is the answer to what some are calling “the open web”. I know the open web term usually refers to the interoperability between technology but to me these terms are used interchangeably all the time. See Zuckerburg’s IM conversation for yourself (well a piece of it).

Permalink 2 Comments